The initial Genesis article shows that when considering
the big bang as the statement "let there be light" on the
first "God day", that the odds became 208,000,000:1 of God
being the source based on TIMING alone, and much higher odds
when calculating the PHRASES used.
Further, that Genesis basically gave away how to measure a
star based on that star exploding.
What? How could this be?
First see the Genesis, planet formation, moon formation,
planet density profile, pre-sun, and other pre-sun stars
articles and:
From those discussions it's pretty clear that Genesis
is accurately describing our solar system's formation.
What's also clear is that a "firmament" ring forms
under the surface of stars due to fusion of lighter
elements.
But where is the fusion occuring that forms the heavier
elements?
The typical explaination is that fusion is occuring in
the star's inner core due to intense pressure from
gravity and the heat generated from that pressure.
But are there any OTHER sources for fusion?
Yes.
And God described that source in Genesis. God said
HIS spirit moved UPON the SURFACE of the "waters", the
firmament later forming within the waters.
From X-ray photos of the surface of the sun, it's
pretty clear that the hottest areas of our present day
sun are near the equatorial region. Quite a few solar
flares occur there, as do sun spots, which by the way
is where the actual IR signature of water has been found.
Notice, God said he moved UPON the SURFACE of the "waters".
That's a big clue that he'd formed the heavier elements
at the surface of the star or above it. Those heavier
elements being formed at the hottest region (the solar
equator) would then begin to drop down within the star
under the surface, of which there are confirmed reports
of plasma flows under the surface of the sun. That inner
plasma flow runs along the solar equator.
The net effect?
Those heavier elements beginning near the solar
equator and then dropping down inwards into the
sun will tend to speed up rotation wise relative to
the rest of the sun. Therefore the solar poles would
be spinning SLOWER than the equatorial region. Science
has shown that this is in fact the case. Further that
the inner core spins faster than the poles and the
fastest rotation is where the heavier elements are
FALLING inwards... at the solar equator, the hottest
area seen on the sun.
Notice again, God said he moved UPON the SURFACE of
the "waters", the "firmament" forming later BETWEEN
the "waters". Therefore, the heavier "firmament"
matter had to fall and in the process, had to speed
up in rotation, eventually slowing again as it continues
inwards towards the core.
Also notice, the entire sun is a complex mass of
elements and density verses depth. The speeding up
near the equator does in fact make sense given
heavier matter being formed there and falling inwards.
So how does this show how you can measure a star
based on it exploding?
Simple, that inner ring of heavier elemental matter
is able to eventually explode in a FISSION explosion.
The ring being roughly uniform due to hundreds of
millions of years of inner plasma flow along the equator,
will eventually build up enough fissionable matter
to explode starting at ONE slightly more unstable
position along the ring and then continue to FISSION
away around the ring.
The FISSION explosion would travel two paths around
the star's inner equatorial region, both FISSION
zones traveling at the speed of light around the
ring and the ring then exploding outwards.
The total time to explode the entire ring is basically:
explosion time = 1/2 "firmament" length / c
(Where c = 300,000,000 m/s)
Likewise:
1/2 "firmament" length = (explosion time) * c
And of course:
"firmament" radius = (explosion time) * c / pi
(pi = 3.14159...)
So just by knowing how long it took for the star to
have it's "firmament" ring undergo a FISSION explosion,
you can determine the radius of the star's inner firmament
ring.
So how do you measure the "ring explosion time"?
Basically, this is done with specially built
neutrino detectors buried deep within the earth.
Neutrinos are output by the exploding star in
massive amounts during the fission explosion
event.
Of course this assumes that the exploding star's
inner "firmament" ring is "face on" to earth, or
that you can view the ring as a circle from
earth. If the ring isn't "face on", there will
be additional delays distorting the apparent
"fission explosion time".
So how can you confirm the "fission explosion time"
will give the star's inner "firmament" radius?
Well, the supernova star SN1987A sent out a pulse
of neutrinos that were recorded here on earth.
Luckily, SN1987A's "firmament" ring was just about
"face on" to earth and the received neutrino pulse
was recorded as lasting for about 13 seconds of time.
During that 13 seconds, the "firmament" ring
exploded starting at one spot on the ring and
travelled around the two paths to the other
side of the ring. So basically both halves of the
ring were fissioning away over 1/2 the length
of the overall ring. And from the above equation:
"firmament" radius = (explosion time) * c / pi
SN1987A
"firmament" radius = (13 sec)*(3x10^8m/sec)/pi
= 1.24 x 10^9 meters
For comparison:
Our sun's radius = 0.7 x 10^9 meters
This says SN1987A's "firmament" radius was:
"firmament" radius = (1.24x10^9)/(0.7x10^9)
normalized vs. sun
= 1.8
Basically, SN1987A was more than 1.8 times larger that
our sun prior to exploding. The "firmament" ring was
of course under the surface of the star, so the star
was larger than that "firmament" radius indicates.
Science agrees, SN1987A was larger than the "firmament"
radius indicates. In fact, it's generally accepted that SN1987A
was about 15 to 20 solar masses, or basically:
====================================================
SN1987A was 2-3 times larger in radius than our sun.
====================================================
So the "firmament" ring being 1.8 times larger and under
the surface does in fact make sense.
It's pretty clear that the "firmament" ring really does
form and does eventually explode later to form planets,
moons, comets, asteroids, etc...
Obviously God was right in saying:
* He moved upon the surface of the waters.
* A "firmament" later forming
* That "firmament" forming between the "waters".
* That "firmament" exploding and separating the "waters".
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Note: The above information was written by John P. Boatwright and is freely given. The information is simply my opinion based on how I perceive the content discussed. Anyone reading such should use their own judgement as to whether or not the information has any value to them. You may copy portions of the above opinions as long as a reference to this page is included and no text within said portion is altered. If copied to another medium other than the internet, include the entire text. The above content may change over time.
Best wishes.