Proof Genesis Describes a "pre-sun" Star.

The initial Genesis article shows that when considering
the big bang as the statement "let there be light" on the 
first "God day", that the odds became 208,000,000:1 of God 
being the source based on TIMING alone, and much higher odds
when calculating the PHRASES used. 

But after further investigation, it's become quite clear
that God was in fact describing a "pre-sun" star which
exploded due to a ring shaped "firmament" or higher
density FISSIONABLE matter ring under the surface of that
"pre-sun" star. 

A discussion of a possible basis for this is at: 

SN1987A discussion

And there are numerous confirmations that such a thing
occurred. The moons density being lighter than the 
earth, the earth's density profile, asteroid density, 
the overall planet density profile, water on about 
every planet, water on comets, comets eventually burning 
off said water to become asteroids, asteroids being 
lighter (and out further) than the earth's mean density, 
the matter regathering to coat the earth and moon having 
both the same crust and similar to the matter forming 
asteroids... it all matches.

(See the previous planet formation, moon formation,
 and planet density articles for discussion of these.)

=======================================================
Finally, all the planets revolve around the sun in the
same direction: counter clockwise when viewed from way
above the earth's north pole. This is in fact the same 
direction that the sun itself spins on it's own axis. 
Further, the planets are all in pretty much the same 
plane and minor inclination differences easily attributed 
to variations expected in the original explosion. The
individual planetary rotations on their own axis's of
course varies dramatically, but this too is also to be
expected at the local level after an explosion.
=======================================================

All confirming that the "pre-sun" was the source of the 
planets, the matter exploding outwards from a ring shaped 
FISSION explosion of matter originally located under 
the surface of that "pre-sun" star.

It's fairly clear that this was what was described in 
Genesis 1 of the original masoretic Hebrew text of the 
Old Testament, as discussed below.

The previous Genesis table including the "pre-sun" star
looks like:

*********************************************************

 What?           Genesis "God day"           Science    Match?
==============================================================

-------------------------------               - 12 Byr  
Big bang, "pre-sun" shines    1               - 11 Byr    Yes
-------------------------------               - 10 Byr
Firmament ring, explosion     2               -  9 Byr    Yes
-------------------------------               -  8 Byr
Earth regathers water, land   3               -  7 Byr    Yes
-------------------------------               -  6 Byr
Moon, planets, sun shines     4               -  5 Byr    Yes
-------------------------------               -  4 Byr
First Ocean life              5               -  3 Byr    Yes
-------------------------------               -  2 Byr
Man and land animals          6               -  1 Byr    Yes
-------------------------------               ~  0 (<10,000 yrs ago)
God resting from work         7                  NOW

Of this, science has confirmed that some stars actually
did light up within 2 billion years after the big bang.
The initial matter prior to that "pre-sun" star shining
would of course be "void and without form".

Ring explosions have been photographed by Hubble Space 
Telescope and ring shaped planet forming dust clouds have 
as well. Given the known age of the upper crust matter of 
the earth and a necessary regathering, the water and 
land matter would in fact begin gathering in the 3rd 
"God day", between the times of the explosion and when 
the final upper crust's age is dated to.

So how would the Genesis statements match science
given a "pre-sun" star being described?

1.  "Earth and heavens" are void and without form.
    Science agrees, initial matter after the big 
    bang was not part of stars, just matter and
    energy shooting outwards, stars later to form.

2.  The "earth and heavens" were merely "waters" 
    (or lighter elemental matter).  Science confirms, 
    initial elements were lighter elements, mostly 
    hydrogen.

3.  In the "earth and heavens" both being together, 
    they are somewhat gathered but are still DARK
    where God said "darkness upon the face of the deep".
    Science confirms, the initial matter cooled (became
    dark) and then gathered to form stars.

4.  "let there be light". Science agrees, some stars 
    did in fact light up within the first 2 billion 
    years after the big bang. This does not void the
    previous Genesis TIMING odds calculation since
    "let there be light" is still occurring in the
    same "God day", the start of the big bang being
    when God made the initial matter and energy,
    that matter and energy being "void and without
    form". Hence, the TIMING would not change from
    the previous article. 

5.  "divided the light (energy) from the darkness (matter)".
    Science agrees, matter and energy would have to 
    separate when that star would begin to shine.

6.  "firmament" forms under the surface of the star,
    between lighter elements above and lighter elements
    below. In other words, a ring of higher density 
    FISSIONABLE matter begins to form. Science confirms 
    both plasma flows running along the solar equator 
    of a star and fusion in the star is building heavier 
    elements. The hottest areas of a star are at the
    equator (X-ray photos), hence the most fusion is
    occurring near the equator. Fusion beyond iron is 
    a cooling and energy storage process, the rotation 
    of the star causes the heaviest elements to gather 
    in the equatorial orientation and those heavier
    than iron elements forming would tend to regulate
    the temperature of the star until the point where 
    a FISSION based explosion would occur.

7.  The "firmament" explodes, "waters" above being shot
    out to extreme distances, the "firmament" matter 
    shot out somewhat less, and the "waters" below that
    initial FISSIONABLE matter move out the least.
    Science confirms the ring shaped explosions and
    ring shaped dust clouds.

8.  God then confirms the explosion of the firmament
    by renaming the "firmament" the heavens or 
    "outside the bounds of earth"... our solar system. 
    Science agrees, ring shaped dust clouds around 
    planet forming stars would make the planets in
    a solar system.

9.  God then confirms REGATHERING by saying the "waters"
    then gathered in to earth. Science confirms in
    that the heaviest density matter in the explosion
    would be somewhat between the center of the star
    and the outer surface. The lightest elements of
    matter would be at the outside surface and below
    the ring shaped FISSIONABLE matter. The "waters"
    below would be part of that initial regathering
    of matter in that they were not shot out as far,
    hence the "waters" below would gather soonest.

10. God confirms the density profile of the REGATHERING 
    matter by saying the lands gather in next, rising 
    above the "waters". Science agrees in that the
    higher density matter was the explosion source
    and was shot out further than the "waters" below.
    That higher density matter would then have to
    return some to regather to those "waters".

The remainder of Genesis was discussed in the original
article.

At this point, there is not one sentence in Genesis 
that can not be matched to what is observed by science.
Each and every statement made in being right, sends 
the odds to absolutely incredible levels, well beyond
the 208,000,000:1 odds previously calculated for the
TERMS being right, and fantastically beyond the already
astronomical odds for the previous PHRASES.

The fact that God knew of a planet forming explosion,
the need to have such a "pre-sun", the mention of
the initial densities prior to the explosion, the
fact he used "separated the light from the darkness"
for both the "pre-sun" and "final sun" lighting up
and no where else in the text, etc... leaves no room
for doubt that the account was direct from God. 

God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.

Return

Note: The above information was written by John P. Boatwright and is freely given. The information is simply my opinion based on how I perceive the content discussed. Anyone reading such should use their own judgement as to whether or not the information has any value to them. You may copy portions of the above opinions as long as a reference to this page is included and no text within said portion is altered. If copied to another medium other than the internet, include the entire text. The above content may change over time.

Best wishes.