This reference topic is odd, since it's about listing information that: isn't there. It's also a little tough since, "how do you know the information isn't there?" Well... you go to typical "experts" in the field, and see if they admit they have NO information. OR, if they do have information, do they agree with each other that they know the correct answer? Anyway, here is the MISSING information: 1. There is STILL no accepted theory that answers planet formation. 2. There is STILL no accepted theory that answers the rings exploding out from supernova stars. The questions become: Why can't science find or agree on accepted theories for these? What are the references showing where science admits they don't know, or admit their theories don't answer them? Well, here we go: Both of #1. and #2 above are of course already answered by God, he described the same thing they've seen in deep space photos around planet forming stars, the LINE or CIRCLE having formed on the "foundations of the earth", that "firmament" RING exploding out, the entire "spectrum" of the elements forming the DUST DISK that then regathers into planets, moons, comets, asteroids, etc... So what has science said about this over the last 3000 years? Has science really answered the stuff, admitted they don't know, or do they have theories that don't agree with each other? Let's check and see: 1. CNN gave a report on Dec 25th 1999 titled "New, improved Hubble returned to the heavens" where Senior Hubble scientist Dave Leckrone said: "... Hubble will lead the way in giving us the first really clear understanding (of how) planets are formed". So, as of this writing, they still don't know how planets formed and they admit it. They are still trying to figure it out. But, the correct theory has been posted for over 2.5 years, and during that time, it's been rejected since it describes something unexpected, yet matching what's observed, and data continues to show up showing it's right. Science's two biggest problems with planet formation is that their present theories don't account for HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL ORBITS, nor do they cover the planet density profile seen. Both effects say directly that our solar system's planets sourced from the relative position of our sun. But their theories can't produce what they've seen or measured. Bits and pieces of the theories can predict bits and pieces of the results seen, but when combined, the theories tend to CRASH together. The theories are incompatible with each other. Hence the quote you see above from the Hubble scientist. Continuing on... 2. For the rings leaving SN1987A, as of yet, there has been no agreed on theory for the rings leaving. At first there was an idea presented where dual tightly focused beams would be "drawing" the rings, but that was eventually dropped. Supernova theory has real trouble with SN1987A since the star continues to shine on... their theory says the star should have ended after exploding. Other stars have shown multiple ring type explosion events, multiple later rings exploding out after the first ones exploded out. In other words, their supernova theory can't describe what they're seeing, the stuff seen is unexpected. Again, this one follows the same answer as planet formation that God had already described 3000 years ago, the LINE or CIRCLE forming on the "foundations of the earth" and the "firmament" RING exploding out separating the "waters", planets, moons, comets, asteroids, etc... forming after. God had already described what they are seeing now and of course, God said he did it, God said he described it, and God said his creation shows that he is the source of it. God was exactly right. God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Note: The above information was written by John P. Boatwright and is freely given. The information is simply my opinion based on how I perceive the content discussed. Anyone reading such should use their own judgement as to whether or not the information has any value to them. You may copy portions of the above opinions as long as a reference to this page is included and no text within said portion is altered. If copied to another medium other than the internet, include the entire text. The above content may change over time.
Best wishes.