Proof God Correctly Renamed Terms in Genesis

Genesis is full of proof that God gave the account.

In this article, I'd like to point out where God DEFINED
and RE-DEFINED a few terms, and that by doing so and 
then ending up right, God becomes the only possible
source of the account. 

Otherwise, said statements would require even MORE 
intelligence than man had just prior to this last 
century. Given that Moses was just an average 
sheep herder, God had to have told him the account 
3300 years ago.

So what terms were defined or redefined?

1.  "waters" as the initial form of matter making up
    the heavens and earth. This is correct in that
    only lighter elements existed at right after the
    "big bang".

2.  "earth" as initially "waters" but being "void and 
    without form". This too is correct in that Genesis
    is saying that earth's matter was around from the
    beginning, but that it was of a different form,
    it's form being VOID or emptyness. This is correct in
    that being only lighter elements at the time, the
    earth's initial form of matter was atoms that would
    have to form into heavier elements later on to give
    the final earth's form.

3.  "heavens" as initially "waters" but being "void and
    without form". Basically the same as #2 above.

4.  "firmament" forming in the initial "waters". This
    is true in that heavier more dense elements had
    to eventually form, they would have to form within
    said "waters".

5.  "darkness upon the face of the deep", this one is
    true in that right after the "big bang", the initial
    matter cooled and become dark.

6.  "let there be light", previously "darkness upon
    the face of the deep". This had to occur when the
    "pre-sun" star began to shine. Whereas before there
    was darkness, now there was light. 

So now we come to were terms begin to be RE-DEFINED
by God, the basic definitions would then be CHANGED 
by God himself and them changing is in fact expected 
by science:

7.  And from #6 above, God DEFINED a new set of terms
    in the 1st "God day", he claimed the darkness as
    the night or evening, and the light as the day
    or morning. The "darkness" occurred over the first
    1 billion years after the "big bang" as the initial
    stars began to form but hadn't lit up yet. The 
    "light" occurred when the "pre-sun" star began 
    to shine, the first 1-2 billion years after the 
    "big bang".

    Hence that darkness and then light defines the
    timing in 1/2 "God day" periods. God clarified
    this RENAMING by then calling the "darkness" as
    "night" and the "light" as "day". 

8.  To further impress #7, God then cleared the use 
    of the "day/light" vs. "night/darkness" occurring
    in the first "God day", by saying the "evening 
    and the morning" made up the first 'God day'.
    All subsequent "God days" refer to the SAME amount
    of time used in the first "God day". 

9.  Notice that the "firmament" forming within the
    "waters" is in fact what science expects, heavier
    elements had to begin forming. This is a blatant
    statement that the "waters" were CHANGING form
    from just "waters" to now "waters" with "firmament"
    forming within them.

10. Since the "earth and heavens" were making up the
    "waters", they too were changing form to become
    part "firmament".

11. God then changed the "firmament" from passive
    and being formed by God, to the "firmament" becoming
    ACTIVE and the "firmament" then dividing the
    "waters" above and below it, to then explode outwards
    as a RING and that RING of heavier elements formed
    a planet forming dust disk.

12. God then RENAMED the "firmament" the "heavens".
    This too is expected by science in that the
    exploding out heavier elements would in fact
    eventually form the planetary matter, the moons,
    the comets, etc...

13. The "heavens" were initially "waters" of which 
    said usage is no longer mentioned. This since 
    the "heavens" were renamed as described in #12 
    above. Science again agrees in that the heavens 
    had to be made from the lighter elements which 
    formed into heavier elements and then ejected 
    outwards... the final heavens, the planets, the 
    moons, the comets and the space in-between them.

14. Similar for #13 for the "earth" previously as 
    "waters" which in that form is no longer mentioned. 
    And just like #13, the earth formed from 
    RE-GATHERING elements that were ejected outwards 
    when the "firmament" exploded outwards.

15. But notice, the earth is FIRST formed from 
    RE-GATHERING "waters", gathered into ONE PLACE, 
    that's "earth" being RE-DEFINED as gathering 
    "waters". Hence, earth previously WAS gathered 
    as waters, exploded outwards and then RE-GATHERED. 
    This is EXACTLY RIGHT with what science expects 
    for said "firmament" explosion.

16. Further, the "earth" continues to be RE-DEFINED 
    in that "dry land" is now said to gather in and 
    that "dry land" would then rise above the "waters". 
    Here earth is now defined as both "waters" and 
    "dry land".

17. God then RE-DEFINES the "waters" on earth as the 
    "seas".

18. God then RE-DEFINES the "dry land" as the "earth".

Amazingly, all those terms have to be redefined as 
shown due to the very nature of the events occurring, 
the forms of matter being changed, and the eventual 
usage of said terms.

No sheep herder >>> 3300 YEARS AGO <<< would have 
known to bother with such RE-DEFINING of terms or 
why it'd be necessary.

Given that Moses couldn't have possibly known the 
value or necessity of renaming several terms in 
Genesis, it's clear that Genesis absolutely has 
way too much proof showing God to be the source. 

God's own statements are just spilling out of the 
text, the world being flooded with the TRUTH of God 
having made his creation.

God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.

Return

Note: The above information was written by John P. Boatwright and is freely given. The information is simply my opinion based on how I perceive the content discussed. Anyone reading such should use their own judgement as to whether or not the information has any value to them. You may copy portions of the above opinions as long as a reference to this page is included and no text within said portion is altered. If copied to another medium other than the internet, include the entire text. The above content may change over time.

Best wishes.